Elephant Dung Hints At New African Species
SAN DIEGO, California, September 13, 2002 (ENS) - Genetic evidence extracted from elephant dung has revealed that a previously unknown type of elephant is roaming the African forests and plains. Biologists at the University of California, San Diego have used DNA to show that the elephants of west Africa are genetically distinct from the continent's two known elephant types.
Biologists and conservationists now widely accept the designation of two species of elephants: Asian and African. The UCSD discovery could, if confirmed by additional genetic evidence, split the African group into three distinct species or subspecies: the well known savanna elephant, the recently recognized forest elephant of central Africa, and west African elephants, which live in both the forest and savanna.
"This discovery is important, because the west African elephants are threatened with extinction as a result of human activities," said David Woodruff, a professor of biology and chair of the ecology, behavior and evolution section of UCSD's division of biological sciences.
"If these findings are confirmed, zoologists and conservation managers will need to recognize three different species of African elephants, all of which need protection because their numbers are declining," Woodruff added.
The samples were collected by Lori Eggert, the first author of the paper and a postdoctoral researcher at the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of Natural History. Eggert traveled to Africa while working as a doctoral student in Woodruff's UCSD laboratory, which specializes in the development of non-invasive techniques to collect and assess genetic information from dangerous or difficult to observe wildlife populations.
Wild elephants fit this category since they can kill humans when threatened and are almost impossible to see in the dense vegetation of the forest regions.
"Since it's difficult to see forest elephants in the dense vegetation, we don't have solid census data from many populations, including some of the largest ones," explained Eggert.
"Only a quarter to a third of African elephants are forest elephants, so there are only about 120,000 to 150,000 of them," she added. "They live in a habitat that is rapidly being logged and converted to agriculture. Increasingly, forests in Africa are becoming fragmented and elephant populations are being isolated in a sea of farms and villages."
Wildlife managers estimate that 400,000 to 500,000 elephants now live in Africa. The majority of these African elephants, about 250,000 to 350,000, are savanna elephants, while western elephants are estimated to number only about 12,000.
Forest elephants are smaller than the savanna forms; have longer, thinner and straighter tusks, smaller and more rounded ears, a flatter forehead region and a larger number of toenail like structures on their feet. West African elephants, which the UCSD study suggests are genetically and geographically isolated from elephants elsewhere on the continent, have been described as morphologically indeterminate, or having both forest and savanna forms.
Based on their genetic data, the UCSD biologists believe that the west African populations have been isolated for as long as 2.4 million years.
The UCSD scientists note in their paper that while their genetic analyses, which focused on maternally transmitted DNA, suggest the existence of "three recognizable taxa of African elephants," their results need to be confirmed before a formal taxonomic revision of the African elephants is proposed. That confirmation would require examination of additional nuclear DNA sequences that are inherited paternally as well as maternally.
"If the level of genetic differentiation between the three taxa identified here is confirmed to reflect several million years of divergence, it will be appropriate to treat them as species in recognition of their long independent evolutionary trajectories," they write in their paper.
Because nearly all of the African elephants in zoos are savanna elephants, the results do not have implications for elephants now in captivity. Zoos do not have forest elephants, largely because they are so elusive, and only three western elephants are now in captivity at the Abidjan Zoo in Côte d'Ivoire.
"Only the savanna elephant populations of Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe in southern Africa have been considered for limited resumption of the ivory trade," said Eggert, "and they have been allowed this only because their management has been so successful that it has resulted in elephant populations that are stable or growing too large."
However, "knowing that forest elephants are very different genetically from savanna elephants means that overpopulation in some southern African savanna parks should not lead to a relaxation of the protection for elephants elsewhere, especially in the forests," Eggert argued. "These populations are not exchangeable, either ecologically or genetically."
The forest and western elephant populations are in the most trouble because they are rapidly losing habitat to human uses such as farms and towns, Eggert noted.
"If current trends of forest conversion and human-elephant competition for necessities like habitat and water continue, all elephants other than those in the highly managed protected areas of southern Africa will continue to be endangered," she said. "Even a limited resumption of the ivory trade could lead to increased hunting of forest elephants for ivory. Thus, while all three genetically distinct types of elephants are threatened, those in west Africa are now highly endangered."