Environment News Service (ENS)
ENS logo

INSIGHTS: Yucca Mountain - What Is at Stake for Our Nation?

By LeRoy Koppendrayer
Chairman, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission and Chairman, Nuclear Waste Strategy Coalition

ST. PAUL, Minnesota, July 14, 2004 (ENS) - Two years ago, Congress overwhelmingly ratified the President’s February 15, 2002, recommendation to proceed with licensing and development of a permanent repository for the nation’s civilian and defense nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. One would have thought that the repository was on its way to being completed. This is not the case. Instead, the very existence of the nuclear waste disposal program is threatened due to lack of annual funding.

Our nation’s plan for the disposal of civilian and defense nuclear waste was established by Congress when it passed the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA) in 1982. The NWPA included a provision for funding the nuclear waste disposal program through a federal nuclear waste fund. Since 1983, ratepayers across the nation have paid and continue to pay into the nuclear waste fund.

Koppendrayer

LeRoy Koppendrayer, a Republican, served in the Minnesota State Legislature 1990-1998. Chair of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission and of the Nuclear Waste Strategy Coalition, he serves on the Board of the Organization of Midwest States which oversees the Midwest electricity grid. (Photo courtesy MPUC)

As mandated by Congress, the nuclear waste fund is designed to fund the Department of Energy’s establishment of a safe, timely, and cost-effective centralized storage and permanent disposal of the civilian spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. Unless Congress comes to grips with the intent of the NWPA, the nuclear waste disposal program may soon come to a grinding halt.

The nation’s ratepayers who receive electric energy generated from nuclear power make more than $750 million per year in payments into the nuclear waste fund, and with interest credits, this amount exceeds $1 billion annually. After deducting expenses to date, the fund now holds about $15 billion.

Unfortunately for the public, this account balance has been used to camouflage the federal deficit each year, rather than for developing a repository to receive spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste from the nation’s nuclear power plants, as intended by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. After being chronically underfunded for years, the nuclear waste disposal program now faces its most severe budget crisis ever.

In its FY 2005 budget, the Department of Energy requested $880 million to keep the project on track. However, the administration only allocated $131 million for the defense nuclear waste disposal program and zero for the civilian waste disposal program, incorrectly assuming that legislation would be enacted which would provide $749 million from annual ratepayer contributions.

Though the House Energy and Commerce Committee recently approved this legislation (H.R. 3981), only $131 million was marked-up by the House Appropriations Energy and Water Development Subcommittee and it did not attach the bill to the FY 2005 Energy and Water Appropriations bill.

fuel pool

Spent fuel rods underwater at a receiving basin for off-site fuels, Savannah River Site, South Carolina. (Photo courtesy DOE)
Unless the House and Senate enact H.R. 3981 expeditiously, the Program will not be able to retain an adequate workforce to meet the milestone dates necessary to allow waste to be accepted by 2010. As a result, spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste could be stranded indefinitely at plant sites throughout the nation.

Killing the current federal program permanent repository at Yucca Mountain would have dire consequences to the nation’s electricity generation portfolio, and the environment. Nuclear power comprises 20 percent of our nation's base-load electric generating capacity and produces no controlled air pollutants, such as sulfur and particulates, or greenhouse gases.

Generating electricity from commercial nuclear power plants in place of other more polluting energy sources means fewer dangerous emissions are released into our nation’s atmosphere. However, failure to provide a permanent repository for spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste could lead to nuclear power plants being shut down, and forcing further reliance upon burning coal or expensive natural gas.

To aide this ailing program, we understand that Senator [Pete] Domenici plans to introduce a proposal to temporarily increase the fee customers’ pay into the nuclear waste fund through their electric bills. This one-year only “transition fee” should collect $446 million to help make up for the $749 million shortfall in the Department of Energy's fiscal year 2005 budget.

However, since the nuclear waste fund already contains a $15 billion unused balance, the members of the Nuclear Waste Strategy Coalition are not in favor of taxing the nation’s ratepayers with an increased fee.

As a regulator, I believe it will be very hard for a state utility commission to justify double taxing its ratepayers when we have a $15 billion balance in the nuclear waste fund.

Further, we are very concerned that any increase in the nuclear waste fund fee could become permanent. However, if this single-year fee will be the instrument that clears the way to remove the nuclear waste fund fees from the annual appropriations stranglehold permanently and the DOE can tap annually into the corpus of the nuclear waste fund, as needed, then the Nuclear Waste Strategy Coalition may consider supporting it.

Yucca

Yucca Mountain, Nevada is located 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas. (Photo courtesy DOE)
Government studies have determined that the current fee level is sufficient to build and operate the disposal site if these fees were appropriated annually. However, over the past several years, Congress has failed to appropriate adequate amounts. The resulting severe funding constraints have threatened the Program’s ability to meet important Program milestones.

If Congress would enact legislation to codify the nuclear waste fund annual receipts as offsetting collections, it would ensure that every cent collected from the ratepayers will be delivered to the Program, as intended by the 1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act. Therefore, the members of the Nuclear Waste Strategy Coalition urge the full House and Senate to enact H.R. 3981 expeditiously to ensure that this Program does not falter or come to a grinding halt.

The Nuclear Waste Strategy Coalition is comprised of 45 organizations in 25 states, including state regulators, state attorneys general, nuclear electric utilities and associate members working together to hold the federal government accountable for its contractual and statutory obligations to remove spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive material from nuclear power plants across the nation to interim storage and to a permanent repository.

 

U.K. Leads the Way in Banning Toxic Ingredients in Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Veteran Journalist Predicts Industrial Crash, Says Sustainable Living Could Save Us American Public Health Association Supports Ban On Hormonal Milk And Meat From Shock to Taking Stock: Celebrating 50 years of Successful Sea Turtle Conservation Give Peas a Chance – Pulses Offer Improved Sustainability in the Field and on the Plate EarthSure's "AirRay™ Auto" Applications Open for 2010 Cohort of Kinship Conservation Fellows Dr. Samuel Epstein's 20 Year Fight Against Biotech, Cancer-Causing Milk CO2 Detector Warns You When Indoor Air is Bad Safeguarding the Sun’s Energy With EarthSure's Solar Alarm System California, Midwest Would Gain Jobs from Greater Government Investment in Green Transit Buses Teanaway Solar Reserve: An Engine for Economic Growth and New Jobs Canadian Forestry Leader Urges Ambitious Global Action to End Deforestation Le Secteur Forestier Canadien Preconise Des Mesures Ambitieuses a L'Echelle Mondiale Pour Faire Cesser la Deforestation EarthSure's SolarCure Giving a Gift That Benefits the World Southwest Airlines Debuts 'Green Plane' With Environmentally Friendly Interior Materials Hormones in U.S. Beef Linked to Increased Cancer Risk Critigen Debuts; Serves as Global Catalyst to Modernize Critical Infrastructure EarthSure's "Dynamic Duo": the World's New Heroes in Renewable Energy Cancer Expert Counters Reckless Claims That Hormonal Milk Is Safe U.S. Postal Service Advances Toward Sustainable Future International Model Named Goodwill Ambassador For Wildlife Foundation Biodiesel Returns More Energy to the Earth Than Ever, Study Finds Ten Years of Green Investing and Financial Performance Obama Told Only "Robust and Effective Federal Effort" Can Ensure "Coastal Louisiana's Survival" Wi-Fi U-SNAP Module Now Available From Intwine Connect Top Green Jobs During the Recession Micronutrients, a Division of Heritage Technologies, LLC was Recently Featured on 'Green Magazine TV' on the Discovery Channel for Its Sustainability Efforts Procter & Gamble Products Featured on 'Green Magazine TV' on the Discovery Channel for Their Sustainability Efforts Unrecognized Cancer and Hormonal Risks of Avon Products United GREEN to Provide Expert Moderator for GreenEnergyTalk.org Open Forum 48 Environmental Groups Receive 2009 TogetherGreen Innovation Grants GreenEnergyTalk.org Launches Public Green Information Discussion Board Cancer: The Health Risk Behind the Cosmeceutical Mask Shark Savers Launches Worldwide "Thank You" to Palau for Protecting Sharks PayItGreen Introduces New Membership Program Second Episode of 'Green Magazine TV' to Air on the Discovery Channel in November The World Bank Group-led Initiative To Be Featured on 'Green Magazine TV' World's First Green Hotels Directory Launched PR Newswire and World-Wire Join Forces to Showcase Environmentally-Focused News and Events
WW TRANSMIT
 

License ENS News
for websites and newsletters

Send a news story to ENS editors

Upload environmental news videos

Share ENS stories with the world