Democrats Rank High, Republicans, Low on Conservation Voters 2010 Scorecard
WASHINGTON, DC, February 17, 2011 (ENS) - The League of Conservations Voters today released the 2010 National Environmental Scorecard amidst the greatest attack on the EPA's budget in 30 years and current Congressional assaults on the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, wildlife and wild places.

Generally, Democrats in both the Senate and the House scored high on environmental votes, many hitting 100 percent, while Republicans scored low, many hitting zero.

"While the lack of progress in 2010 is highly disappointing, we applaud those members of Congress who fought to protect public health and the environment and reduce our nation's dangerous dependence on oil," said Tiernan Sittenfeld, LCV senior vice president of government affairs.

"Conversely," she said, "the 2010 Scorecard clearly exposes those members who put corporate polluters and other special interests ahead of the health and well-being of all Americans by opposing efforts to transition our nation to a clean energy economy, enforce commonsense pollution safeguards, and protect the environment."

New York Senator Charles Schumer, a Democrat, scored 100 percent. (Photo courtesy Office of the Senator)

The 2010 Scorecard includes six different Senate and nine different House votes on issues ranging from clean energy to public health protections to lands conservation.

LCV President Gene Karpinski calls the number of Senate votes available for scoring, "a paltry and disappointing number that reflects the extent to which environmental opponents stymied efforts to even debate key legislation."

Of the six Senate votes included, two were pro-environment and both were defeated. One would have cut subsidies to oil and gas companies, and the other would have eliminated tax breaks for the top income earners and invested the savings in renewable energy.

The other Senate votes include a delay of implementation of the EPA's lead paint rule, an anti-environmental border fence amendment, and an extension of the what LCV calls an "environmentally harmful" biodiesel tax credit.

Given the "disastrous impact" of the resolution offered by Senator Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, LCV double scored that vote, which would have blocked the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

Due to decisions made by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, a Maryland Democrat, the House did not take up any of the legislation by representatives who sought to prevent the EPA from moving forward with protecting public health and holding polluters accountable under the Clean Air Act.

Now Speaker of the House John Boehner of Ohio, a Republican, scored zero percent. (Photo credit unknown)

In view of the fact that there were no floor votes on this top priority issue, LCV has taken the highly unusual step of scoring cosponsorship of any of these bills.

In its most significant environmental action of the year, the House passed a bill to respond to the oil spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico.

The House also considered other legislation, including votes to boost energy efficiency, prevent ocean acidification, reduce algal blooms, restore the Upper Mississippi River Basin, expand water education, protect our estuaries, and expand the San Antonio Missions Park.

The Senate failed to act on many of these measures, resulting in what the LCV called "a dismal legislative session across the board."

This year, 24 senators earned a perfect 100 percent score, while in the House 119 members earned a perfect 100 percent score. In the Senate, 28 senators earned a zero percent score, while in the House 81 members earned a zero percent score.

A major indicator of the change in landscape in the House for 2011, the average lifetime score of members defeated in the 2010 election cycle is 73 percent.

"Unfortunately, the most important votes of 2010 are the ones that didn't happen," LCV President Gene Karpinski. "The Senate failed to even begin debate on a comprehensive clean energy and climate bill and also failed to respond to the greatest environmental disaster in our nation's history - the catastrophic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico."

"Unfortunately, we lost many environmental champions in the 2010 elections, and in many cases they have been replaced by climate change deniers who have been quite vocal about their disdain for commonsense safeguards to protect our air and water," said Karpinski. "The new House leadership has also made clear that it is intent on undoing decades of environmental progress during the 112th Congress."

Some influential members of Congress and their scores:

For 40 years, the LCV's National Environmental Scorecard has been used to rate members of Congress on environmental, public health and energy issues.

Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2011. All rights reserved.