Environment News Service (ENS)
ENS logo
Appeals Court Reverses Limits on Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining
RICHMOND, Virginia, February 17, 2009 (ENS) - A federal appeals court Friday reversed a lower court ruling that limited the controversial coal mining practice called mountaintop removal.

In mountaintop removal coal operations, the peaks of mountains are blasted away with explosives to expose coal seams and the waste materials are dumped into streams, causing what the plaintiff environmental groups claim is irreversible ecological damage.

In a victory for the coal industry, a panel of the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that U.S. District Judge Robert Chambers erred in his March 2007 decision that required full consideration of the environmental effects of mountaintop removal and slowed the issuing of new permits.

Judge Chambers had ruled that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers violated the Clean Water Act in issuing permits for four mountaintop removal coal operations.

The appeals court concluded that Judge Chambers did not properly defer to the Corps' interpretation of its own rules when granting Clean Water Act, CWA, permits for the coal mines.

"In matters involving complex predictions based on special expertise, a reviewing court must generally be at its most deferential," wrote Judge Roget Gregory on behalf of himself and Judge Dennis Shedd.

Judge M. Blane Michael dissented from parts of the decision that found the Corps had rightly concluded the mining operations in question would cause no significant environmental degradation.

"Rather than basing its decision on the (binding) language of the regulations," Judge Michael wrote, "the majority focuses instead on the Corps' compliance with an internal guidance document that is at odds with the regulations' clear requirements. The effect is to completely undermine the goal of mitigation: replacement of what is being lost."

"Because the Corps has offered no basis on which to conclude that the environmental impacts of the valley fill projects as mitigated will be insignificant," Judge Michael wrote, "this court should reject the mitigation as inadequate under the CWA and NEPA [the National Environmental Policy Act]."

Catenary Coal Company's mountaintop removal operation on Kayford Mountain, West Virginia. January 2006. (Photo by Vivian Stockman courtesy Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition; flyover courtesy SouthWings)
The case was originally filed by Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Coal River Mountain Watch and the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy against Aracoma Coal Company, a subsidiary of Massey Energy, and four others, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A clutch of mining companies filed briefs in support of the defendants.

Environmental groups say the appeals court decision will allow up to 90 more mountain peaks to be removed by coal mining operations.

They argue that this form of mining poisons drinking water, lays waste to wildlife habitat, increases the risk of flooding and wipes out entire communities.

"Today the coal industry – aided by the Bush administration – is allowing our water to be poisoned," said Judy Bonds of Coal River Mountain Watch. "Tomorrow it will be the East Coast's water supply as the mining discharges will reach downstream water sources."

"Aside from the people, the mountains and streams of West Virginia are two of our greatest assets that should be protected fervently for the benefit of future generations," said Janet Keating, executive director of the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition.

"We believe the decision is wrong on the law and the science," said Steve Roady, Earthjustice attorney who represented the environmental groups. "This fight is not over until mountaintop removal mining is over. We will continue to litigate and in addition, the new administration must take immediate steps to curb the terrible practice of mountaintop removal mining and undo the mistakes of the past."

In December 2008 the Bush administration repealed a rule requiring buffer zones around streams where wastes from mountaintop removal could not be dumped.

With repeal of the rule, coal companies are now able to dump tons of mining waste into streams without violating the Clean Water Act.

"Either Congress or the Obama administration need to reinstate the Stream Buffer Zone rule and to pass the Clean Water Protection Act," said Tierra Curry, conservation biologist with the Center for Biological Diversity. "But better yet, mountaintop removal should be prohibited and the burning of coal immediately phased out to save the planet from dangerous climate change."

Since mountaintop removal coal mining began in 1970, an estimated 1.5 million acres of hardwood forest have been lost, over 470 mountaintops have been blasted, and 1,200 miles of Appalachian streams have been buried.

Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2009. All rights reserved.

 

U.K. Leads the Way in Banning Toxic Ingredients in Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Veteran Journalist Predicts Industrial Crash, Says Sustainable Living Could Save Us American Public Health Association Supports Ban On Hormonal Milk And Meat From Shock to Taking Stock: Celebrating 50 years of Successful Sea Turtle Conservation Give Peas a Chance – Pulses Offer Improved Sustainability in the Field and on the Plate EarthSure's "AirRay™ Auto" Applications Open for 2010 Cohort of Kinship Conservation Fellows Dr. Samuel Epstein's 20 Year Fight Against Biotech, Cancer-Causing Milk CO2 Detector Warns You When Indoor Air is Bad Safeguarding the Sun’s Energy With EarthSure's Solar Alarm System California, Midwest Would Gain Jobs from Greater Government Investment in Green Transit Buses Teanaway Solar Reserve: An Engine for Economic Growth and New Jobs Canadian Forestry Leader Urges Ambitious Global Action to End Deforestation Le Secteur Forestier Canadien Preconise Des Mesures Ambitieuses a L'Echelle Mondiale Pour Faire Cesser la Deforestation EarthSure's SolarCure Giving a Gift That Benefits the World Southwest Airlines Debuts 'Green Plane' With Environmentally Friendly Interior Materials Hormones in U.S. Beef Linked to Increased Cancer Risk Critigen Debuts; Serves as Global Catalyst to Modernize Critical Infrastructure EarthSure's "Dynamic Duo": the World's New Heroes in Renewable Energy Cancer Expert Counters Reckless Claims That Hormonal Milk Is Safe U.S. Postal Service Advances Toward Sustainable Future International Model Named Goodwill Ambassador For Wildlife Foundation Biodiesel Returns More Energy to the Earth Than Ever, Study Finds Ten Years of Green Investing and Financial Performance Obama Told Only "Robust and Effective Federal Effort" Can Ensure "Coastal Louisiana's Survival" Wi-Fi U-SNAP Module Now Available From Intwine Connect Top Green Jobs During the Recession Micronutrients, a Division of Heritage Technologies, LLC was Recently Featured on 'Green Magazine TV' on the Discovery Channel for Its Sustainability Efforts Procter & Gamble Products Featured on 'Green Magazine TV' on the Discovery Channel for Their Sustainability Efforts Unrecognized Cancer and Hormonal Risks of Avon Products United GREEN to Provide Expert Moderator for GreenEnergyTalk.org Open Forum 48 Environmental Groups Receive 2009 TogetherGreen Innovation Grants GreenEnergyTalk.org Launches Public Green Information Discussion Board Cancer: The Health Risk Behind the Cosmeceutical Mask Shark Savers Launches Worldwide "Thank You" to Palau for Protecting Sharks PayItGreen Introduces New Membership Program Second Episode of 'Green Magazine TV' to Air on the Discovery Channel in November The World Bank Group-led Initiative To Be Featured on 'Green Magazine TV' World's First Green Hotels Directory Launched PR Newswire and World-Wire Join Forces to Showcase Environmentally-Focused News and Events
WW TRANSMIT
 

License ENS News
for websites and newsletters

Send a news story to ENS editors

Upload environmental news videos

Share ENS stories with the world