FirstEnergy Nuclear Hit With Record Fine for Reactor Damage
WASHINGTON, DC, April 22, 2005 (ENS) - The largest single fine ever proposed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) was handed to FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Thursday.
The $5.45 million fine was levied against the company in connection with reactor vessel head damage discovered in March 2002 at the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant at Oak Harbor, Ohio, 21 miles southeast of Toledo.
The principal violation, assessed a $5 million fine, was that the utility restarted and operated the Davis-Besse plant in May 2000 without fully characterizing and eliminating leakage from the reactor vessel head which led to significant corrosion damage.
Additional violations, assessed a $450,000 fine, included providing incomplete and inaccurate information to the NRC on the extent of cleaning and inspecting the reactor vessel head in 2000.
“This substantial fine emphasizes the very high safety and regulatory significance of FirstEnergy’s failure to comply with NRC requirements and the company’s willful failure to provide the NRC with complete and accurate information,” said Luis Reyes, NRC executive director for operations.
In 2001 the NRC directed Davis-Besse and other plants to inspect by December 3, 2001, the tubes which penetrate the reactor vessel head for possible leakage.
FirstEnergy requested that it be permitted to operate an additional three months before shutting down for the inspection, and the NRC staff, based on information submitted by FirstEnergy, permitted the plant to operate until February 16, 2002.
“FirstEnergy supported its request with inaccurate and incomplete information about the cleaning and inspection of the reactor vessel head in 2000,” said Reyes. “Had the NRC known that the plant was being operated with leakage through the reactor vessel head, the agency would have taken immediate action to shut down the plant.”
The corrosion damage to the reactor vessel head was discovered about three weeks after the plant shut down. The plant remained closed for more than two years for replacement of the reactor vessel head and improvements to other safety systems. Significant changes were also made in the plant’s management.
After extensive inspections by the NRC of improvements to safety systems and the utility’s efforts to raise safety consciousness in the plant’s management and staff, the NRC determined that Davis-Besse could restart and operate safely. The NRC also required that the utility undertake annual independent assessments of important plant activities for five years.
In addition to the fine proposed for the utility, the NRC has issued an order to Andrew Siemaszko, who was a system engineer at Davis-Besse, which prohibits his involvement in activities regulated by the NRC for a five year period.
Siemaszko was responsible for ensuring that the reactor vessel head was cleaned and inspected during the 2000 outage.
Records prepared by Siemaszko indicated that the reactor vessel head was cleaned and that no damage to the head was found. The agency found that he had deliberately provided incomplete and inaccurate information in plant documents, which are required by the NRC. Siemaszko no longer works at Davis-Besse.
Enforcement action may be taken against additional individuals in the near future, the NRC said.
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) said it is "reviewing" the notice of violation and the proposed $5.45 million fine. FirstEnergy Nuclear is a subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp, based in Akron, Ohio.
The company says, "The corrosion problem on the plant’s reactor head was discovered during a comprehensive inspection and reported to regulators in March 2002. Subsequently, FENOC investigated the causes of the problem, replaced the reactor head, and made numerous staff changes, as well as enhancements to plant programs and equipment. Davis-Besse has operated safely and reliably after it was successfully restarted in March 2004."
The utility and Siemaszko are required to respond to the enforcement actions within 90 days. They may request an extension of the response date. In addition to these actions, the NRC has previously referred Davis-Besse issues to the Department of Justice.
In its letter to the company, the NRC said that this action does not reflect the current performance of Davis-Besse and no further civil enforcement action is expected, unless there is new information from the Department of Justice.